DORA requires financial institutions to maintain a Register of Information (RoI) for ICT third-party providers by April 2025. To meet this, you can use either LEI (Legal Entity Identifier) for global operations or EUID (European Unique Identifier) for EU-specific entities. Choosing the right one impacts costs, data quality, and compliance strategy.
Key Points:
- LEI: Global, detailed ownership data, paid, annual updates.
- EUID: EU-only, free, basic registration data, auto-updates via national registries.
- For Global Providers: LEI is better due to cross-border recognition.
- For EU Providers: EUID is cost-effective and simpler.
Quick Comparison:
| Aspect | LEI | EUID |
|---|---|---|
| Global Recognition | Yes | No |
| Cost | Paid | Free |
| Data Depth | Detailed (ownership info) | Basic registration details |
| Updates | Annual | Auto via national registries |
| Cross-border Use | Global | Limited to EU |
Tip: Use LEI for international providers and EUID for EU-based ones to balance costs and compliance.
DORA Compliance Unveiled: Managing Third-Party Risks
LEI: Structure and Applications
The 20-character LEI (Legal Entity Identifier) combines a prefix assigned by GLEIF with entity-specific details, ensuring precise global identification of ICT third-party providers under DORA.
LEI Main Functions
The LEI system plays a key role in supporting DORA compliance by offering reliable entity identification. Financial institutions can use LEIs for:
- Unique Provider Identification: Assigns each ICT service provider a globally recognized identifier, simplifying regulatory reporting.
- Risk Assessment: Provides verified data, including ownership structures, to help evaluate providers as required by DORA Article 28.
- Cross-Border Oversight: Facilitates standardized identification across jurisdictions, aligning with DORA's cross-border oversight goals.
LEI Implementation Challenges
Despite the benefits, financial institutions encounter practical hurdles when implementing LEIs:
| Challenge | Solution |
|---|---|
| Data Maintenance | Use GLEIF API for streamlined updates |
| Provider Adoption | Combine onboarding validation with education efforts |
GLEIF's lookup tools and APIs simplify data management, directly aligning with DORA's risk management requirements .
While LEIs provide global coverage, the EUID offers region-specific advantages. This distinction will be discussed in the next section.
EUID: System and Usage
EUIDs integrate country codes, business register codes, and registration numbers within the EU's BRIS system. They act as a standardized way to identify entities registered in the EU's Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS) .
EUID Access and Cost Advantages
EUID offers several benefits, particularly for smaller providers, by streamlining processes and cutting costs:
| Benefit | Description | Impact on Providers |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Assignment | Issued during business registration | No need for a separate application |
| Cost Structure | Free of charge | Reduces compliance expenses |
| Maintenance | Auto-updates via national registers | Lowers administrative workload |
| EU Recognition | Valid across all member states | Eases cross-border operations |
In October 2024, the European Banking Authority announced that smaller providers could use EUID instead of LEI for DORA's register of information. This change significantly lowers compliance costs .
EUID Data Challenges
Despite its benefits, the EUID system faces several operational hurdles:
1. Data Consistency Issues
Differences in language and the level of detail across national registries make verifying information more difficult .
2. Update Synchronization
While updates are handled through the BRIS network, they can take several days to reflect across EU systems .
3. Handling Non-EU Providers
Non-EU providers face additional complexities. Branches rely on local EUIDs, subsidiaries must register separately, and parent companies typically use LEIs .
Currently, the system manages over 20 million registered companies across EU business registers . While this demonstrates its broad adoption, it also highlights the importance of addressing data quality and synchronization issues, especially for institutions navigating global operations. For these cases, combining EUID with LEI is a common strategy - an approach discussed further in the next section.
sbb-itb-107f699
LEI vs EUID: DORA Requirements Analysis
Choosing between an LEI (Legal Entity Identifier) and an EUID (European Unique Identifier) for DORA compliance is a critical decision for financial institutions managing ICT third-party providers. This choice affects how organizations meet DORA's Register of Information requirements using specific identifiers.
Here's a side-by-side comparison of their key differences:
| Aspect | LEI | EUID |
|---|---|---|
| Global Recognition | Recognized worldwide | Limited to the EU |
| Cost | Requires payment | Free of charge |
| Data Depth | Includes ownership structures | Basic registration details |
| Update Process | Annual updates required | Dependent on national registries |
| Cross-border Utility | Fully functional across borders | Limited outside the EU |
| Data Verification | Centralized via GLEIF | Managed by multiple national registries |
| Regulatory Reporting | Detailed data fields | Basic identification information |
For critical ICT providers, the European Supervisory Authorities have emphasized that the LEI provides stronger tools for assessing systemic risks. Its standardized 20-character format and real-time data verification make it particularly effective for tracking high-risk providers.
The right identifier depends on factors like operational scale, geographic focus, and system compatibility. For global operations or providers with significant non-EU exposure, the LEI is often the better choice due to its international recognition and comprehensive data. On the other hand, EU-focused entities may find the EUID more appealing because of its no-cost structure and alignment with EU-specific operations .
Consider provider geography (EU vs global), operational scale, and compatibility with frameworks like GLEIF or BRIS when making this decision. These elements are essential for crafting effective operational strategies, as detailed in the next section's implementation guide.
Using LEI and EUID: Step-by-Step Guide
Financial institutions must meet the April 2025 deadline to set up DORA-compliant ICT third-party provider registers . To properly use LEI and EUID identifiers, organizations need a clear, organized plan that ensures accuracy and thoroughness.
Identifier Verification Tools
Here are some useful tools for verifying identifiers:
- DORApp: Automates compliance workflows.
- Custom API integrations: Handles bulk processing efficiently.
These tools are especially helpful when dealing with non-EU providers, which require specific handling.
Managing Non-EU Providers
When working with non-EU providers, financial institutions should follow these strategies:
- Sort providers by whether they are based in the EU or outside it.
- Use temporary IDs while onboarding LEIs.
- Gather essential documents, including:
- Jurisdiction and regulatory details.
- Relevant identifiers.
- Risk assessment reports.
- Records of compliance checks.
This approach aligns with ESA guidance, which emphasizes prioritizing LEIs for non-EU providers alongside maintaining detailed documentation .
Conclusion: Summary and Next Steps
With the January 1, 2025, compliance deadline for DORA on the horizon, financial institutions need to solidify their strategies for implementing LEI and EUID systems. The dual-identifier framework requires a thoughtful approach, balancing LEI's global reach with EUID's cost efficiency . Institutions should ensure their systems can handle both identifiers while staying adaptable to future regulatory updates.
LEIs stand out for their global acceptance and reliable data quality, while EUIDs provide a budget-friendly option for operations within the EU . To navigate this dual framework, organizations should focus on:
- Creating automated processes for verification
- Designing systems that support both LEI and EUID
The European Commission's 2026 review of digital operational resilience requirements may bring further adjustments to how LEI and EUID are used, particularly in third-party oversight . In preparation, financial institutions should prioritize:
- Finalizing their Register of Information (RoI) by January 1, 2025
- Establishing combined LEI and EUID checks for both EU and non-EU providers
This proactive approach will help institutions meet compliance requirements while staying flexible for any future changes.
FAQs
For financial institutions working on DORA compliance, here are some common questions:
What is the DORA EU ID?
The DORA EU ID, or European Unique Identifier (EUID), is a standardized system used to identify legal entities within the European Union. It's provided at no cost to EU-based providers, reflecting DORA's focus on fairness for smaller EU entities .
What is the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) under DORA?
The Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) is a unique 20-character alphanumeric code used to identify legal entities in financial transactions. Under DORA's final rules, critical ICT providers are required to have an LEI .
Here’s why LEIs matter for DORA compliance:
- Required for high-risk providers as per ESA guidelines
- Facilitates cross-border assessments and checks
- Ownership data is kept current through GLEIF's automated updates
Annual verification ensures the accuracy of LEI data, making it especially helpful for institutions dealing with international ICT providers .
Related Blog Posts
- XBRL Reporting for DORA: A Complete Implementation Guide
- Is excel an appropriate tool to maintain the DORA ICT Third-Party Register of Information?
- ESA's DORA reporting deadlines you should watch for in 2025
- Overview of DORA’s Draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) and Implementing Technical Standards (ITS)
